ford pinto carrefour’s Pinto case problem “ ethical motive Case: The Value of Life” 1) No, get across did not flak catcher the question of redesigning the gas tank to perplex the car safer versus tone down another year allowing the foreign market to dominate subcompacts. elemental their goal to maximize profits was their only priority. They did not reason the stakeholders involved and when they did come into consideration, they were analyzed against profits. One has nothing to do with the other. Their goal should not have been a race to equal the most affordable subcompact car.

Their focus should have been to build up the most affordable but safest subcompact. They were aware of the dangers associated with the rush promote from the crash tests, whereas, only three cars passed because they had gas tank modifications. 2) Ford had a social and ethical responsibility to their customers to stop operation once the danger were apparent and take the necessary measures to slip away th...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.